StructureDefinition-oncology-ProgesteroneReceptorNuclearPositivity-model

Sourcehl7.fhir.us.breastcancer#0.2.0:null (v3.0.2)
resourceTypeStructureDefinition
idoncology-ProgesteroneReceptorNuclearPositivity-model
canonicalhttp://hl7.org/fhir/us/breastcancer/StructureDefinition/oncology-ProgesteroneReceptorNuclearPositivity-model
version0.2.0
statusdraft
publisherThe HL7 Cancer Interoperability Group sponsored by Clinical Interoperability Council Work Group (CIC)
nameProgesteroneReceptorNuclearPositivityModel
titleBC ProgesteroneReceptorNuclearPositivity Logical Model
date2018-08-17T00:00:00+10:00
descriptionThe percentage of cells that test (stain) positive for the presence of progesterone receptors. We are seeking feedback on whether nuclear positivity should be an exact percentage or a range of percentages. As currently defined, an exact nuclear positivity could be represented by a zero-width range, where the lower and upper bounds would be the same number. We are seeking feedback on whether nuclear positivity should be an exact percentage or a range of percentages. As currently defined, an exact nuclear positivity could be represented by a zero-width range, where the lower and upper bounds would be the same number.
kindlogical
abstractfalse
sdTtypeoncology-ProgesteroneReceptorNuclearPositivity-model
derivationspecialization
basehttp://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Element
keywordshttp://loinc.org#14230-7: 'Cells.progesterone receptor/​100 cells in Tissue by Immune stain'
Usages(none)
Name Flags Card. Type Description & Constraints doco
. . oncology-ProgesteroneReceptorNuclearPositivity-model 0..* Element This logical model cannot be the target of a reference
. . . value 1..1 shr-core-Range-model Range representing the percentage of cells that test (stain) positive for the presence of progesterone receptors. We are seeking feedback on whether nuclear positivity should be an exact percentage or a range of percentages. As currently defined, an exact nuclear positivity could be represented by a zero-width range, where the lower and upper bounds would be the same number. We are seeking feedback on whether nuclear positivity should be an exact percentage or a range of percentages. As currently defined, an exact nuclear positivity could be represented by a zero-width range, where the lower and upper bounds would be the same number.
. . . topicCode 0..1 Coding The concept representing the finding or action that is the topic of the statement.
. . . exceptionValue 0..1 Coding Reason that a value associated with a test or other finding is missing.
Binding: Data Absent Reason ( extensible )
. . . interpretation 0..1 Coding A clinical interpretation of a finding (applies to both assertions and observation).
Binding: Observation Interpretation Codes ( extensible )
. . . referenceRange 0 .. 0

doco Documentation for this format

Produced 08 Sep 2023