Cross-Version Extension for Contract.term.offer.topic in R4

URLhttp://hl7.org/fhir/4.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Contract.term.offer.topic
Version
Statusactive
Description

Cross-Version Extension for Contract.term.offer.topic. Valid in versions R2, R3

This is a valid cross-version extension because it's counted as a new element

Context of Use

This extension may be used in the following contexts:


NameFlagsCard.TypeDescription & Constraintsdoco
.. Extension 0..1ExtensionNegotiable offer asset
... extension ..0
... value[x] 1..Reference(Resource)
... url "http://hl7.org/fhir/4.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Contract.term.offer.topic"

doco Documentation for this format

{
  "resourceType" : "StructureDefinition",
  "id" : "xv-r4-ctt.ter.off.topic",
  "url" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/4.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Contract.term.offer.topic",
  "name" : "XVerExtensionContract.term.offer.topicR4",
  "title" : "Cross-Version Extension for Contract.term.offer.topic in R4",
  "status" : "active",
  "experimental" : false,
  "publisher" : "Health Level Seven International (Financial Management)",
  "contact" : [{
    "telecom" : [{
      "system" : "url",
      "value" : "http://hl7.org/fhir"
    }]
  },
  {
    "telecom" : [{
      "system" : "url",
      "value" : "http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/fm/index.cfm"
    }]
  }],
  "description" : "Cross-Version Extension for Contract.term.offer.topic. Valid in versions R2, R3\r\n\r\nThis is a valid cross-version extension because it's counted as a new element",
  "jurisdiction" : [{
    "coding" : [{
      "system" : "http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49.htm",
      "code" : "001"
    }]
  }],
  "fhirVersion" : "5.0.0",
  "kind" : "complex-type",
  "abstract" : false,
  "context" : [{
    "type" : "extension",
    "expression" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/4.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Contract.term.offer"
  },
  {
    "type" : "extension",
    "expression" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/4.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Contract.term.offer"
  }],
  "type" : "Extension",
  "baseDefinition" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Extension",
  "derivation" : "constraint",
  "differential" : {
    "element" : [{
      "path" : "Extension",
      "short" : "Negotiable offer asset",
      "definition" : "The owner of an asset has the residual control rights over the asset: the right to decide all usages of the asset in any way not inconsistent with a prior contract, custom, or law (Hart, 1995, p. 30).",
      "comment" : "The Contract.topic may be an application for or offer of a policy or service (e.g., uri to a consent directive form or a health insurance policy), which becomes the Contract once accepted by both the grantor and grantee. \rThe Contract Resource may function simply as the computable representation of the executed contract, which may be the attached to the Contract Resource as the “binding” or as the “friendly” electronic form.  For example, a Contract Resource may be automatically populated with the values expressed in a related QuestionnaireResponse. \rHowever, the Contract Resource may be considered the legally binding contract if it is the only “executed” form of this contract, and includes the signatures as *The Contract Resource may function as the computable representation of an application or offer in a pre-executed Contract if the grantor has not entered any values.  In this case, it is populated with values in a “legal” form of the application or offer or by the values in an associated Questionnaire.  If the grantor has filled in the legal form or the associated Questionnaire Response, then these values are used to populate a pre-executed Contract Resource.\rIf the Contract.topic is considered an application or offer, then the policy is often required to be attached as the “legal” basis for the application to ensure “informed consent” to the contract, and that any discrepancy between the application and the policy are interpreted against the policy.  Implementers should check organizational and jurisdictional policies to determine the relationship among multiple representations of a contract pre- and post-execution.",
      "requirements" : "In the context of a contract, the topic is the matter under consideration in regards to which specific rights, privileges, obligations, restrictions, and prohibitions are binding on any grantor and grantee parties upon the execution of the contract. \rGiven the wide range of contract topics, implementers need to be cognizant of the business use case for which they are designing a FHIR Contract, and narrowly specify the topic being represented with respect to the Contract.type and any specializing Contract.subtype. \rThe same topic, e.g., an asset such as a good or service, such as a real property, medical supply, insurance, information, a procedure or employment, or a manner of conduct, such adherence to a privacy, trust, or security policy, may be the topic of multiple types of contracts. \rOne way to determine the Contract.topic is to answer the question: “What is the object of negotiation?”\rAnswer: The Contract.topic, which may be described with more detail in the [0..*]Contract.valuedItem @ [0..1] Contract.valuedItem.entity[x] Definition: Specific type of Contract Valued Item that may be priced. CodeableConcept|Reference(Any)\rContract.topic is “the what” that a grantor is exchanging with a grantee in return for some benefit. \rContract.topic is “the what” to which any Contract.action is being applied for any stipulated Contract.action.reason. \rAContract.topic is “the what” governed by the execution of the contract to which any party’s rights, privileges, obligations, restrictions, and prohibitions apply.",
      "min" : 0,
      "max" : "1",
      "isModifier" : false,
      "mapping" : [{
        "identity" : "workflow",
        "map" : "Event.context"
      },
      {
        "identity" : "rim",
        "map" : "Includes many ActClass, ActCode, RoleClass, RoleCode, EntityClass, EntityCode, ParticipationType codes from HL7 concept domains and code systems. For example, RoleCode: HLD (held entity) Description: Entity that is currently in the possession of a holder (scoper), who holds, or uses it, usually based on some agreement with the owner. MANU (manufactured product) Description: Scoped by the manufacturer. OWN (owned entity) Description: An Entity (player) for which someone (scoper) is granted by law the right to call the material (player) his own. This entitles the scoper to make decisions about the disposition of that material. WRTE (warranted product) Description:\rA role a product plays when a guarantee is given to the purchaser by the seller (scoping entity) stating that the product is reliable and free from known defects and that the seller will repair or replace defective parts within a given time limit and under certain conditions."
      }]
    },
    {
      "path" : "Extension.extension",
      "max" : "0"
    },
    {
      "path" : "Extension.value[x]",
      "min" : 1,
      "type" : [{
        "code" : "Reference",
        "targetProfile" : ["http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Resource"]
      }]
    },
    {
      "path" : "Extension.url",
      "fixedUri" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/4.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Contract.term.offer.topic"
    }]
  }
}